Academy Award® Winner
Director Michael Bay (Armageddon, The Rock) brings this epic to the big screen, covering the events surrounding December 7th, 1941 and its impact on two young pilots and a beautiful nurse.
sustained intense war sequences, images of wounded, brief sensuality and some language
Starring Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett, Kate Beckinsale... View more >
Oscar ® Winner for Best Achievement in Sound Editing
Looking for more opinions? Check out our Featured Movie Reviews for Pearl Harbor.
Please Note: Reader Reviews are submitted by the readers of The BigScreen Cinema Guide and represent their own personal opinions regarding this movie, and do not represent the views of The BigScreen Cinema Guide, or any of its associated entities.
You will definately see this movie more then once.......It is better then the Titanic.....
The movie has everything, love, passion, war and peace - and it only had 2 swear words in the entire movie......
Heroic men and women are still around that were part of this awesome historical saga.
Of course a lot of the movie is part truth but it will grasp you and hold you till the ending scene. Better bring a handkerchief......
A great movie to see on the big screen. Lots of action and the camera work is fantastic. It seems a lot shorter than the three hours it lasts.
|by Spammela ||May 25, 2001|
Way worth the big screen visuals! The special effects will knock your socks off and the guys (Ben Affleck & Josh Hartnett) aren't half bad either. Don't wait to rent this movie...go see it now! It's your patriotic duty to find out what your countrymen/women endured.
This poignant movie will have you on the edge of your seat in one scene and near tears the next...but it's all good I kid you not! I have a much better understanding of the whole situation, (how it could possibly happen) and want to learn more because of seeing this movie.
GO SEE IT TONIGHT!!!
|by RDL ||May 28, 2001|
Screw the critics! Make an effort to see it on the big screen...won't translate to dvd/video well.
"Pearl Harbor" has plenty of special effects, but aside from that, there's not much to recommend. The film is the fourth retelling of the surprise Japanese attack, dating back to "From Here to Eternity," in 1953. Since then two more movies on the attack on Pearl Harbor, "In Harm's Way" in 1965 and "Tora! Tora! Tora!" in 1970.
My question I had to ask is, "Is the attack on Pearl Harbor worth retelling, the answer is, aside from the special effects is no. The film isn't wroth sitting though without being bored by a three-way tranagle relationship.
Ben Affleck and Josh Hartnett played fighters, who knew each other since they were kids. Entering their lives is Kate Beckinsale as a nurse who fell in love with the other two. The subplot of that relationship must have been planted from "Dawson's Creek." The performance of the cast is dull, except for the chamastic Cuba Gooding Jr. who played a cook until the japanese began to attack and Jon Voight as President Franklin Roosevelt.
During the attack, the film claim that the US shot down 27 Japanese bombers, where in reality they shot down only three. You think maybe the filmmakers had jack up the number to get the audience to cheer? And how about the newreels? They're annoying and should have gotten rid of just to save the film at least four minutes. The real reason why the film is released around Memorial Day weekend, so that the media will promote the movie as a big blockbuster.
In other words, you can't put "Pearl Harbor" on a happy meal. The Pearl Harbor veterans probaby couldn't care less about the movie, except what they experienced is the real thing first-hand.
|by Jenny ||May 30, 2001|
This is a must see movie. Definitely something that is best seen on the big screen. It does not surprise me at all that this movie is doing as well as it is. The love story was something that kept me very interested, the history and the action kept me on the edge of my seat. There is a little something for everyone in this film.
I have to disagree with one of the other comments made here about this movie that it is not worthwhile. The comment was that the movie mentions that the US shot down 29 planes which supposedly was not true. My comment to this is that this is not a history film. Yes, it is based on historical events but if you are expecting something that will follow historical accounts completely accurately, then this is not the right movie. Obviously some points are going to be dramatized a bit more for the Hollywood appeal.
Also, the comment that this is the 4th retelling of Pearl Harbor should not keep people from seeing this. This is a story that should be retold and should not be forgotten. It is definitely worthwhile. Great acting, great special effects. Bottom line - a great story!
|by Dean Berglund ||May 31, 2001|
I know there has been some less than great reviews about this movie but I say, See this movie now. It's a great movie and needs to be seen on the big screen. I didn't realize how devistating the destruction was at Pearl Harbor until I saw this movie.
This was a good movie overall. it was too long for my taste though (3 hours and 6 minutes). Good plot, although it was somewhat predictable. Great special effects, so seeing it in a theater would be best. Could have been a better movie without all the sappy love scenes and if it dealt more with the war itself.
|by jschuldt ||Jun 1, 2001|
See it now! It's the best! Be ready to cry.
|by Kay ||Jun 2, 2001|
I agree, screw the critics. I'd admit it is not a perfect movie, yet it is really worth seeing.
Pearl Harbor plays like a miniseries that could be spread across three nights. At just over three hours, it will probably receive the miniseries treatment when it reaches network television. This length, however, is not so drawn out that you start looking at your watch, wondering when the end will be.
If you haven't heard by now, this isn't a documentary about the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the politics that drew us into World War II. It's a love story that is set against that time period, and the bombing just happens to occur during the telling of the story. Set aside your expectations of historical accuracy and see it for what it is.
If you do this, I believe that you will enjoy this movie. At times, it was a little melodramatic for my taste, with scenes that look like they were meant to be picturesque and meaningful. These run counter to your expectations of what a Michael Bay / Jerry Bruckheimer film is supposed to be, but perhaps that is not so much a fault of the filmmakers than it is of the viewers...
Being titled "Pearl Harbor" means that the bombing sequence is going to get a lot of attention, and the film definitely does not disappoint. While you are not drawn into it as fully as you are with the beginning of Saving Private Ryan, the attack is seen from multiple perspectives and you get a feeling that you are watching it in real time. Very well done.
The love triangle the forms the plot of the movie is weak, but present, and serves as the constant through the three parts. While likable, you never get close to any of the characters, and this is perhaps the movie's greatest failing. In Titanic, I was drawn into the relationship between Jack and Rose, and here, it didn't much matter who ended up with whom.
Pearl Harbor earns a See Now! rating due to the spectacle of the movie, and the excellent visuals and sound effects. The masters at Industrial Light & Magic did such a superb job of special effects work that I did not once notice which scenes were the result of their handiwork and which were on-set. The bombing sequence will test the mettle of any theater, so make sure you see this in the best sounding theater you can!
While not an epic of the likes of Ben Hur or even Tora! Tora! Tora!, Pearl Harbor is worth the price of admission and begs to be seen on the big screen.
|by Mark & Marla ||Jun 3, 2001|
This movie is on a level with Titanic. However, in this movie, the love story isn't nearly as predominant as in Titanic (making it easier for the guys to swallow). Good one to see for both men and women.
The 3 hours actually go by pretty fast - some movies drag on and on, making you wonder when it'll be over, but not this one.
|by joe ||Jun 3, 2001|
See it! Don't be scared away by the reviewers saying it's only a love story. It is partly a love story, but it is also much more. We loved it.
|by mikec ||Jun 4, 2001|
Two and one half hours of soap opera and thirty minutes of action. I didn't expect three hours of action but so much of the movie had nothing to do with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The romance was cliche and unbelievable.
Characters played by Cuba Gooding Jr. and Colm Feore could have been better developed. The hours following the attack could have been portrayed in greater detail. Instead the filmakers opted to try to cover the Dolittle bombing on Tokyo. Too much to cover in one movie.
The filmakers were shooting for "Titanic" but came up miserably short. I'll only rent it when it's available for the action, sound, and special effects of the bombing. That's all that this film does right. If you want to see a film that does a much better job on this subject, rent "Tora, Tora, Tora".
|by Dan Chapman ||Jun 13, 2001|
I wish there was a rating for "Not worth the hype" or "Barely worth sitting through". I think Pearl Harbor was worth my seven bucks, but I was expecting more from all the previews. It was also WAAAAAY too drawn out. Cuba Gooding Jr. was a waste of talent considering his character added NOTHING but time to the movie. The romance was also kinda stupid for reasons I won't go into in case it'd spoil the surprises for others.
Anyway, the dogfights were cool and the special effects were awsome for a whole... 10 minutes. If you've seen a movie in the past 2 months, you've probably already seen the entire "attack" scene in the previews. The rest of the movie was useless sub-plot in my opinion.
|by Deischel ||Jun 17, 2001|
Rather than going to see this movie, you should find WWII vet and spend some time with them. The movie will always be there, the vets won't.
We can't thank them enough...
|by angie ||Jun 18, 2001|
Good movie, u will have to see it!
|by Jake ||Jun 19, 2001|
I hate rating a movie like this on the system given here. "Good" does NOT describe this movie, but it isn't so bad that you should "Stay Away!" However, waiting for rental isn't a good idea if you're going to see this no matter what, because the translation will lose the only appeal this movie has: great special effects, action, and sound.
Please, don't see "Pearl Harbor" expecting a love story equaling "Titanic." The love story is mediocre at its best, laughable at its worst. Soap opera cliches play a prominant role in the story, so perhaps the best thing to do is ignore the horrendous dialogue and paper-thin characters altogether and enjoy the action (which isn't perfect either; bad science may annoy many viewers).
However, with a three-hour movie, you're sure to get bored pretty soon.
|by Luke ||Jun 21, 2001|
It was hard to decide what to rate this... either a good or see now! I chose see now because even though at times it felt like a soap opera more than a movie, I thought it was really good.
The special effects for the cool scenes were excellent!!! I sat in the theater and was like, Woa. Seeing it in the theaters would be the optimal choice!
|by Christine Roessger ||Jun 24, 2001|
This is a very good movie. Go see it while it's on the big screen. A tv won't do this movie any justice.
|by Lindsey Kotz ||Jun 25, 2001|
this was the best movie i have ever seen!!! ohmygod go see it right now it is the best!!! plus the guys are really hot!
|by wish_star ||Jun 26, 2001|
OMG! Pearl Harbor beats all the other historical movies! The special efects are beyond everythn the cast i superb and the plot is awesome! Whether you like romance, war or hisory go see this movie! I'm going to see it for the second time 'cause I love it so much! Oh and one more thing bring some tissues!
|by Vern Black ||Jul 25, 2001|
A big puff of fluff wrapped in the seriousness of death and carnage. A movie where there is more than meets the eye than the heart. Lots and lots of eye candy. Slow shots of people running around screaming. Got old after awhile. Slow shots are fine a few times, but not all the time.
This movie was a big disappointment. The first of many disappointing summer movie's this year.
|by Puzzleman ||Aug 25, 2001|
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...Great 3 hour nap!!!